Child Walking

They Think With Their Feet: When Do Courts Consider or Give Deference to a Child’s Wishes When Setting a Parenting Plan?

Every attorney who litigates custody disputes has had a client say, “But my child wants to be with me; doesn’t the Court care?” The short answer is: sometimes.

Strictly speaking, the Court has jurisdiction over parenting plans until a child turns 18. That means that, technically, even a 17-year-old is subject to the Court’s determination of when that child should be with which parent. That said, divorce and custody practitioners also frequently hear a judge saying (usually about a child age 16 and up), “Isn’t the child going to vote with their feet,” meaning that, especially for children with driver’s licenses, it is difficult, if not impossible, for a parent or the Court to strictly enforce a parenting plan; the child can, to varying degrees, walk or drive away from a parent’s home to spend time with the other parent.

Under certain circumstances, the Court may go a step further and proactively hear a child’s input by appointing an attorney for the child through the Attorneys Representing Children (“ARC”) program. ARC attorneys volunteer their time to meet with the children and appear in Court to advocate for their wishes. While there is no strict age minimum for an ARC appointment, the reality is that the child should be of an age where the child can provide meaningful input and feedback to the attorney. Otherwise, ARC counsel can be found in Court representing that their client wants Fridays off from school and cotton candy for breakfast on Sundays.

At the end of the day, parents should recognize that the standard the Court needs to apply in making custody and parenting plan decisions is one of the best interests of the child. Children are constantly developing and evolving and may not always know what is in their own best interests. They may also be suffering the emotional effects of the divorce, may have appropriately or inappropriately sided with one parent or the other, may be swayed by the wishes of another sibling, or have strong opinions for any number of reasons. As a result, it is best practice to consult with an attorney who can advise you on whether the Court is likely to consider or give deference to your child’s wishes and to what extent those wishes align with what is in the child’s best interests.

Categorized: Child Custody

Tagged In: ,

About the Authors

Lynette Paczkowski
Stay Connected
LinkedIn

Partner

Lynette Paczkowski

Lynette Paczkowski is a pragmatic and trusted advisor with extensive experience advocating for her clients at trial and appellate courts across Massachusetts. Clients rely on her to protect their interests during stressful, challenging times. Lynette’s empathy for her clients’ situations allows her to understand their priorities and concerns and develop a strategy around those goals. She routinely guides and helps individuals navigate prenuptial agreements, divorces, child custody issues, and other domestic relations disputes. With an extensive and varied litigation background, she also counsels and advises clients and appears in Probate & Family Court to represent them in trust disputes, estate administration claims, and related matters. Given her foundation and background in business litigation, construction litigation, and defense of tort-related claims, she is uniquely suited to also represent her clients in Superior Court and Land Court navigating related breach of fiduciary duty claims and property disputes. 

Stay Connected
LinkedIn

More Posts by Author ›

About the Authors

Lynette Paczkowski
Stay Connected
LinkedIn

Partner

Lynette Paczkowski

Lynette Paczkowski is a pragmatic and trusted advisor with extensive experience advocating for her clients at trial and appellate courts across Massachusetts. Clients rely on her to protect their interests during stressful, challenging times. Lynette’s empathy for her clients’ situations allows her to understand their priorities and concerns and develop a strategy around those goals. She routinely guides and helps individuals navigate prenuptial agreements, divorces, child custody issues, and other domestic relations disputes. With an extensive and varied litigation background, she also counsels and advises clients and appears in Probate & Family Court to represent them in trust disputes, estate administration claims, and related matters. Given her foundation and background in business litigation, construction litigation, and defense of tort-related claims, she is uniquely suited to also represent her clients in Superior Court and Land Court navigating related breach of fiduciary duty claims and property disputes. 

Stay Connected
LinkedIn

More Posts by Author ›

Stay Connected

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.